Client Reviews

Aggregated feedback from corporate IP clients, sorted by relevance and utility.

LO

Luis O'Conner

General Counsel, MedTech Corp

★★★★☆

After the first month of engagement, the firm’s approach to international patent registration under the PCT was methodical and well-documented. The initial audit of our existing filings revealed two priority claims that were incorrectly dated, which could have jeopardized our European entry. The team provided a clear remediation timeline and handled the corrections with the Canadian Intellectual Property Office. The only friction was the pace of responses during the international search phase, but the final report was thorough. I appreciated the absence of generic promises — every recommendation was tied to a specific treaty article or office practice.

CL

Caleb Leannon

IP Manager, FinSecure Ltd

★★★★★

Feedback on communication and setup: the initial onboarding call was scheduled within 48 hours, and the team sent a detailed questionnaire covering our copyright asset inventory, licensing agreements, and existing compliance measures under the Copyright Act. The setup phase included a two-week audit of our digital content platform, focusing on user-generated content and fair dealing exceptions. The advice on implementing a notice-and-notice regime was practical and aligned with current Industry Canada guidelines. The only area where I expected more depth was the analysis of moral rights waivers for our contractor agreements, but the team addressed that in a follow-up memo. Overall, the process felt structured, not rushed.

HL

Prof. Hank Lowe IV

Director of Innovation, Northwood Research

★★★★☆

A returning client experience: we first engaged the firm three years ago for a copyright portfolio audit, and this year we returned for a review of our international patent strategy. The continuity was evident — the same senior advisor handled the account and referenced our previous filings without needing a re-introduction. The updated strategy accounted for changes in the Patent Law Treaty and the new CIPO fee schedule. The team also identified two expired licences that needed renewal before our next product launch. The only reason I am not giving five stars is the delay in the final report, which arrived two days past the agreed deadline. Still, the substance was precise and actionable.

Submit a Client Review

Share your experience with our intellectual property advisory services. Your feedback helps us maintain the highest standard of corporate-legal counsel.

View all client reviews

Rating

Select a rating from 1 to 5 stars based on your overall satisfaction with the engagement.

Review Text

Provide a detailed account of the service received, including specific outcomes, communication quality, and adherence to timelines.

Author Name

Enter your full name or the name of your organization as it should appear on the review.

Submit

Once all fields are completed, click the submit button to send your review for moderation and publication.

All reviews are subject to verification and may be edited for length and clarity. Your contact information will not be published.

Cookie settings

We use cookies to keep the site reliable, remember basic choices, and understand which pages are useful. You can accept, reject, or review the settings before continuing.